Functions and failures
Define required functions, performance standards, functional failures, failure modes and effects in the asset's actual operating context.

Expertise 03
Failure-mode and consequence thinking used to improve maintenance decisions—connecting what an asset must do, how it can fail and which response is technically justified.
Working principleA maintenance task is valuable only when it addresses a credible failure mode at an effective interval and an acceptable level of risk.
Scope of practice
Define required functions, performance standards, functional failures, failure modes and effects in the asset's actual operating context.
Distinguish safety, environmental, operational and non-operational consequences before selecting a maintenance or redesign response.
Use consistent equipment taxonomy, failure descriptions and maintenance records so experience can support repeatable analysis and improvement.
Evidence-led workflow
Each stage protects the quality of the conclusion. A technically correct measurement can still lead to a poor decision when operating context, machine design or maintenance history is ignored.
State what the asset or system must do, for whom and under which operating conditions.
Describe the ways the required function can be lost or degraded.
Record credible causes and what happens locally, to the system and to the operation.
Assess why each failure matters and which risk or performance objective requires protection.
Choose an applicable proactive task, failure-finding task, redesign or run-to-failure decision, then review effectiveness using evidence.
Standards foundation
These references establish the public technical foundation. The applicable machine-specific standard, OEM manual and site procedure always take priority for a real assessment.
Public knowledge
Controlled material
Continue exploring